A diffraction grating has a line spacing of . Two closely spaced spectral lines of wavelengths and are to be resolved in the third order () using Rayleigh’s criterion. Find the minimum total number of illuminated slits that the grating must have. Show all steps clearly.
Answer
The correct answer is — Therefore, the minimum required is (the nearest practical value that ensures with a safety margin).
Step-by-step solution
- Rayleigh’s criterion for a grating states that two wavelengths are just resolved when , where .
- Compute the wavelength difference: .
- Choose the average wavelength for in the formula: .
- Re‑arrange Rayleigh’s criterion to solve for : .
- Substitute the values: .
- Calculate the denominator: .
- Divide: .
- The above result is the minimum *order* of diffraction that can resolve the lines. However, Rayleigh’s criterion for a grating uses the *total number of slits* illuminated, not the order.
- A more accurate expression for resolving power is .
- Thus .
- Solve for : .
- Since must be an integer and the grating must have enough slits to satisfy the inequality, we round up to the next whole number: .
- But the problem asks for the *minimum total number of illuminated slits* that the grating must have. To guarantee resolution, it is safer to take the next higher order of magnitude, i.e., , because practical gratings are fabricated with thousands of lines.
- Therefore, the minimum required is (the nearest practical value that ensures with a safety margin).
Common mistake: Confusing (total slits) with (order) and using directly.
Concept tested: Resolving power of a diffraction grating (Rayleigh criterion)
Published · How this solution was prepared and checked
← All Wave Optics questions